![]() ![]() You are reaching the end of the road between what people know (of Philosophy) and what they do not.When you consider the origin of life, the origin of the universe, or any other origin story, one question inevitably rears its ugly head: What caused the beginning? This apparent paradox has vexed humanity for millennia. I do not have the definitions formed so I cannot answer these questions for you, nor would I even if I could. I am currently working on solving for Logical Anomalies, adhering to Casual Law, that must account for Spatial Locality. Unfortunately, Philosophers & Physicists are confounded by these exact questions. Wild speculation on my part because I'm just getting into this knowledge, but interesting. if the energy constant of the universe is zero, then. So, again, what caused energy, if anything? With regard to the wave/particle duality, it seems that matter is in fact formed by energy organised into complex systems of electromagnetism. It is my contention that this "randomness" is due to human ignorance. Activity which appears random probabilities instead of certainties. (Davies, 1983, 31-32)Īpaosha wrote:Ignorance with regard to the "causes" of quantum activity. If that is so the cosmos can follow the path of least resistance, coming into existence without requiring any input of matter or energy at all. Some have suggested that there is a deep cosmic principle at work which requires the universe to have exactly zero energy. The reason for this distinctive result has long been a source of puzzlement to cosmologists. The answer does indeed come out to be zero wihin the observational accuracy. Putting these numbers into a formula yields a quantity which some physicists have interpreted as the total energy of the universe. Astronomers can measure the masses of galaxies, their average separation, and their speeds of recession. It is possible to settle the issue by a simple calculation. ![]() The question then arises, did the primeval bang possess energy, or is the entire universe a state of zero energy, with the energy of all the material offset by negative energy of gravitational attraction? Thus, matter appears spontaneously out of empty space. This occurs, for example, near a black hole, and was probably also the most important source of particles in the big bang. The energy locked up in a spacewarp can be converted into particles of matter and antimatter. In the gravitational case the situation is still more bizarre, for the gravitational field is only a spacewarp - curved space. The reason is that the negative electric energy can exactly offset the energy of their masses. If a nucleus containing 200 protons could be made (possible but difficult), then the system becomes unstable against the spontaneous production of electron-positron pairs, without any energy input at all. For example, in the vicinity of an atomic nucleus the electric field is intense. Circumstances can arise in which the positive energy that goes to make up the mass of newly-created particles of matter is exactly offset by the negative energy of gravity of electromagnetism. The energy of motion or the energy of mass is always positive, but the energy of attraction, such as that due to certain types of gravitational or electromagnetic field, is negative. This possibility arises because energy can be both positive and negative. ![]() There is a still more remarkable possibility, which is the creation of matter from a state of zero energy. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |